The National Networker Weekly Newsletter and The BLUE TUESDAY Report are TNNWC Publications Geared Toward Early-Stage Enterprises.

Logo Designed by Penny Ng. All rights reserved.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Questioning Motives, Benefits, Costs and Ultimate Effect

Questioning Motives, Benefits, Costs and Ultimate Effect

Note: This article was written by Author Douglas Castle for publication in BRAINTENANCE, THE GLOBAL FUTURIST , TAKING COMMAND! and THE NATIONAL NETWORKER RSS and Daily email feeds (which are available to the public at no charge). This article may be reprinted, re-published or transmitted without the consent of the author provided that the article is published intact, unedited and in its entirety, and that all links contained herein are left live for the reader's reference. You may become a Member of The National Networker Global Interworked Cooperative Business Community and receive our publications (free) by clicking on http://twitlik.com/IN.


Dear Friends:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is about to set down some new, strict, health standards for companies which generate any type of waste products. My preliminary analysis (in brief) of this policy is set forth below a reprint of the article which happened to inspire me to say "I told you so." But I'm not going to do that, as appropriate as that may be. Analyzing this bit of news about a governmental agency policy is a wonderful intellectual/ brain-building and policymaking/ strategic planning exercise. For those of you who are new to this, here's how we play the game:

Firstly, read the article excerpted from THE NEW YORK TIMES which follows; secondly, click the back button and take a look at my findings and see how yours compare. Remember: No peeking at my answers until you have had an opportunity to form your own opinions!
And now (cue drumroll), the article --

Breaking News Alert
The New York Times
Thu, January 07, 2010 -- 11:44 AM ET
-----

E.P.A. Announces Strict New Health Standards for Smog

The Environmental Protection Agency's new limits -- which are
presented as a range -- will likely put hundreds more
counties nationwide in violation, a designation that will
require them to find additional ways to clamp down on
pollution or face government sanctions, most likely the loss
of federal highway dollars.

Read More:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01/07/us/AP-US-EPA-Smog.html?emc=na

####

Okay. Now that you've had an opportunity to preview the policy, compare your findings with mine:

1. MOTIVES - A power-grab by the EPA to further regulate industry under the guise of environmental protection and being green-compliant. A money-grab by the federal government to fund its burgeoning deficit by making counties pay a ransom to the federal government -- it's a sort of reverse federal-aid program to save the federal government money, and to actually collect more tax, penalty and compliance dollars from the counties in every city and state. The federal government is grabbing the near empty wallet of a fellow (metaphorically) already walking to bankrupcy court. [The fellow is walking because he has lost his job and cannot afford cabfare, and because his own automobile is excreting too much CO2, the deadly greenhouse gas that is integral for photosynthesis....but that's another tale].

2. BENEFITS - The federal government, the EPA and scores of attorneys will benefit. The environment (and the people who choose to continue living in it) will benefit by a reduction in potentially toxic factory emissions and cleaner air. Ahhhhh! 

3. COSTS - All borne by the taxpaying public and businesses (the costs of regulatory compliance are generally quite high). There will be increased incentives for businesses, jobs and talent to go overseas. There will be reduced industrial output in the US, decreasing employment, and other additional hardships to numerous to list. Service businesses, which shouldn't be as immediately and precipitously impacted, will feel the pinch as county tax bases are reduced and greater tax burdens are placed upon them.

4. ULTIMATE EFFECT - Negative for all US residents employed (or unemployed) in the private sector. Economically contractionary.

Now: How does your analysis stack up beside mine? You can comment on this article by clicking on:
Please remember to put the words "EPA POLICY" in the subject line of your message.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle


Closing The Doors To Productive Discussion

Closing The Doors To Productive Discussion

Note: This article was written by Author Douglas Castle for publication in THE INTERNATIONALIST PAGE and in THE NATIONAL NETWORKER NEWSLETTER. This article may be reprinted, re-published or otherwise transmitted without the permission of the author provided that it is reprinted, re-published or transmitted in total, unedited, with all hyperlinks left intact and live. Proper attribution should always be given the author and the initial publications where the piece appeared. You are invited to join the National Networker as a member of its GICBC -- you will also receive (free) the TNNW Weekly Newsletter and the Blue Tuesday Report - Simply click on http://twitlik.com/IN. To also receive RSS feeds or daily email from The National Networker Companies, click on http://TheNationalNetworkerWeblog.blogspot.com and make your selection. -DC

Dear Friends:

I am neither a fan of John Kerry's, nor of Bob Livingston's, but I find valuable information in unlikely places because I am always willing to listen, and to learn. Kerry, of the US, leans politically toward the Democratic Party and some ideologically imprecise progressivism (which some refer to as liberalism), while Bob Livingston, the publisher of The Liberty Alert and The Liberty Digest, is a self-professed ultra-conservative, right-winger. The two would seemingly have nothing in common, except that both do a great deal of speaking and promoting within their respective realms of expertise and in accord with their respective agendas for political and social change. Frankly, I find them both a bit annoying - but I am willing to listen to either of them, which is an important point.

The United States, the UK and a number of other nations have become increasingly concerned about the potential for Iran to build up significant nuclear weapons capabilities. Whether or not, any nation has a right to dictate policy regarding self-defense or military strategies to Iran or any other sovereign is another issue. But nonetheless, Iran's reputation for either condoning or sponsoring certain known terrorist organizations, as well as its internal political instability make it an object for concern throughout the Middle East, Asia, Europe and America.

While I do not believe that any nation (or any Human Being) should simply "do what it is told" by the established international community (e.g., the most powerful industrialized nations, plus a few smaller "roaring mice,"), I believe that Iran has made a terrible mistake in its refusal to honor a visit by Senator John Kerry until (through the Iranian Press) "The US changes its policies." This is useless petty political extortion, posturing, and anger-engendering. Imposing conditions by one country upon another before the first will grant an audience to the second sends a message of animousity, and it serves to lend further gravity to any negative feelings and suspicions. The temptation is then to escalate the hostilities on both sides until the scenario is like having a tennis volley with a time bomb as the ball.

Keep all doors wherein there is a possibility for productive, peaceful discussion open. Don't predicate a visit or conversation on an immediate policy change or action on the part of the other party -- a lack of open communication leads each side to suspect the worst of the other.

Ultimately, it comes down to this: Either engage in conversation, or augment the risk of eventual conflict.

Closing the doors to productive discussion can never be a good policy.

An article from Mr. Livingston's publication follows for your information. It puts my point further across.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle,
Internationalist and Individualist
--------------------------------------------------------

John Kerry Refused Permission To Visit Iran

January 6, 2010 by Personal Liberty News Desk  at The PERSONAL LIBERTY DIGEST
Legislators in Iran have rejected top Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) request to visit the country, the media have reported.

According to TheHill.com, Iranian media have said that Kerry, who is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had submitted an official request to visit Tehran as an emissary.
Iran’s Fars News Agency has quoted Zohreh Elahian, a member of the parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, as saying that "The Islamic Republic of Iran has no plans to negotiate with any American official, unless [the U.S.] changes its policies," which was quoted by TheHill.com.

The Iranian news source also said that Parliamentary Speaker Ali Larijani advised Kerry to end America’s hostile policies toward his country, particularly regarding the nuclear issue.

When questioned by journalists, the senator’s spokesman, Frederick Jones, said no trip to Iran was planned at the moment.

The United States and Iran broke off diplomatic relations in the wake of the Iranian hostage crisis during which 53 Americans were held hostage for 444 days from 1979 to 1981 at the U.S. embassy in Tehran. The two countries have held no bilateral talks for the past 30 years, but after his inauguration President Obama suggested he was ready to start talks on normalizing the relations.
However, last September Obama, Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Great Britain and President Nicolas Sarkozy of France alleged Iran has covert plans to build an enrichment plant about 100 miles outside of Tehran, according to The New York Times. ####
---------------------------------------------
ADNFCR-1961-ID-19538745-ADNFCR

COMMENT On This Article!

Share/Save/Bookmark
Subscribe
__________________________________________
Subscribe Free to THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter and the BLUE TUESDAY REPORT.

Labels and Tags: Iran, John Kerry, Bob Livingston, The Internationalist Page, The National Networker Companies, GICBC, Articles by Douglas Castle,

The Road Ahead : Networking at the beginning of a new Decade

by Andy Lopata

In an article at the end of 2008 I talked about how we were on the verge of a new age of networking in the UK, with the move away from referral networks, a more considered approach to networking by businesses and in particular, the growth of choice for businesses using social networks. Little did I know the extent of the changes to come so quickly.

Just one month after writing the article I joined Twitter. Founded in 2006, 2009 really has been the year of Twitter. According to Jason Keath of socialfresh.com, Twitter membership has grown from between two and four million users at the beginning of the year to forty million now. With the increased popularity of Blackberries, iPhones and other Smartphone technology, people can ‘tweet’ on the move…and they like it.

Although I could see big changes in networking to come at the beginning of 2009, the popularity of Twitter and other online networks has moved networking on at a pace I certainly didn’t predict. The worldwide economic climate has also had a big impact on the way businesses and individuals network and its importance to them.

So what can we expect in the year ahead? I want to look at the impact the recession has had and continues to have, on business networking; what we can expect from both online and face to face networks and also the changing importance networking will have for larger businesses.

Social Media


Given the impact that Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn have had on business networking this year, the online world seems the obvious place to start.

The most popular social networks, such as Facebook, MySpace and Twitter, are not ‘business networks’ in the true sense of the term, having been created for social use. However businesses are increasingly embracing all of them.

MySpace is the home for bands, artists and others in the entertainment industry. Other businesses have been more comfortable using Facebook and Twitter, but many of them slowly and reluctantly. I still find that most of my clients, particularly those working for larger organisations, are unsure about using Facebook despite the growth of business pages, ‘fan’ pages and pay per click advertising. Those that do use it prefer to focus purely on using it for social purposes.

There are, however, a growing number of people using Facebook for business. The big brands are making sure they have a presence on the site but it’s mainly smaller businesses, particularly micro-businesses, who use it actively.

In my previous article I said that we needed to move away from people simply looking to connect with as many people as possible across all social networks. This is still a problem. It seems to me that many of the people using Facebook for business still try to build as big a network as possible without worrying about building the relationships. That goes for both large and small businesses. People need to start realizing that networking is about engagement not numbers.

If we can get back to real engagement across Facebook and people become comfortable with who they allow to cross the ‘business/friends’ threshold and what they share with them, we may well see more people working in larger businesses open up their Facebook network to work contacts. There is still a lot of understandable nervousness about doing this so it will be a gradual process.

The growth of Twitter has had an impact on Facebook however.

Twitter has an unfair reputation of being a waste of time, with the common put down being “why would you be interested if someone’s having a coffee?” Many businesses are using Twitter very effectively though, with Dell Computers attributing $3 million worth of revenue to their Dell Outlet Twitter account*.

Savvy business people are raising their profile through Twitter, using the network to share their blogs, build their reputation, ask key questions and more. It’s a great way of keeping your finger on the pulse of business and world affairs and to continually engage with your network. Not only that, it’s also incredibly viral, with your followers happy to share your wisdom with their network with just the click of a button.

The quick hit of a 140 character Tweet makes the site more appealing to many time-poor business networkers than other social networks and this is perhaps where Facebook has taken a hit. Maintaining interest and engagement in a Facebook Group set up for your business can be quite time consuming, while you can dip in and out of Twitter quite quickly and painlessly. Some people who have started to develop a Facebook strategy have quickly left it behind and focused their attention on Twitter.

I anticipate that Facebook will continue to grow over the coming year and I do think that there will be more business use. Twitter’s popularity will, however, restrict that use and many people will prefer to simply post on Twitter and let that feed through to their Facebook page.

I believe that simply feeding one social network with your content from another is a mistake. Wherever possible we should treat each social network individually, based on what we are looking to achieve from it. Why use multiple networks for one purpose?

The language used on Twitter looks out of place on a Facebook page and automated feeding of updates doesn’t discriminate. As a result, some people’s Facebook pages have become meaningless lists of one side of various conversations and couldn’t be less likely to engage visitors. I’d love to see this habit die out. Yet we will still see more applications making it easy for us to update multiple social networks at one time, leaving less differentiation between networks and less reason for people to visit each one of the networks of which they are a member.

Many major marketing agencies now have specialists focusing on social media strategy. I do have a concern that the more the bigger brands embrace Facebook and Twitter, the more smaller businesses could disengage from the sites. Whatever size the business, we need to use these sites to speak with our networks, our customers and our prospects. It’s important to have a two-way process and listen as much as broadcast if the networks are going to maintain their popularity.

As well as the social networks, there are specific business online networks, with LinkedIn enjoying the most successful 2009. Based on the principle of six degrees of separation, LinkedIn is, in my opinion, the site that offers the clearest and potentially best rewards from online networking sites. The trouble is that most people don’t know how to use it effectively.

An article in the Wall Street Journal on December 30th reported how LinkedIn have been opening up to third party developers who want to create applications for the site, much as Facebook have. This is on the basis that LinkedIn users spend much less time on the site than users of other social networks, such as Facebook. (Visitors spent about 13 minutes on average at LinkedIn during October, while Facebook users logged about 213 minutes and MySpace users spent 87 minutes.)

While the right third party applications will help to enhance the LinkedIn experience for some, I think that the focus is in the wrong place. Offering users more applications risks confusing many members, as other sites have found. LinkedIn should focus instead on educating their members on how to make the most of the site. The fact is that you should be able to spend less time on LinkedIn than on other sites and still get greater rewards if you use the site effectively and target the right return.

Now more people have become aware of the potential of LinkedIn, I’d like to see it coming into its own as a referral generation site over the next year and I’m already seeing signs of that happening, I’ve certainly received more requests for connections through LinkedIn in the last few months than ever before.


Face to face networks

So where does this leave the face-to-face networks? There have been fears expressed that the growth of online networks and their convenience will make people less likely to want to attend physical events. Although some people have taken that approach, I think the opposite is true.

While online networks help to broaden our connections and raise our profile, I remain a great believer that you cannot build the same depth of relationship online that you can when you see the whites of people’s eyes. The growth in popularity certainly affects the development of face-to-face networking though.

There has already been a move by a number of face-to-face networks to develop a strong online arm to complement their offering. From alliances with existing social networks to the development of their own online networks (as demonstrated by 4Networking’s 4Community in the UK), traditional networks recognise that they can’t be left behind by the online revolution.

The challenge for them is the reticence of some members of traditional networks to get involved online, together with the growth in the number of social networks. People don’t want to be members of too many. With that in mind, they need to get enough members involved to develop a strong enough discussion to make it worth people’s time visiting and to keep them there. If they can achieve that, they can offer their members a much deeper service, connecting them with each other in person and online and bringing groups around the country, or the World, together.

The growth of online networking has also impacted on face to face networking through more meetings stemming from online groups. The Meetup site has spawned a number of such groups, many stemming from LinkedIn, while Tweetups have grown in popularity too.

This has led to a greater diversity of choice of events; with the growth of niche networks predicted in my previous article. There are networking events for people looking for investment, those interested in property, people in fashion, the arts, the media, bloggers, politics, women’s networks… the list is endless.

The choice of events available to businesses wanting to network means that traditional groups, from Chambers of Commerce to referral networks such as BNI, will have to keep on their toes, keep thinking creatively and perhaps look for ways to enhance their offering and continue to innovate if they are to maintain their relevance to their existing membership and attract new members.

The abundance of networking options also affects the membership fees traditionally charged by networking organisations. With a host of events available for free, members of networking groups will want to see higher fees fully justified. The upside of this is that more businesses are looking to see what the return on their networking investment is, and thinking through how they spend their time. It will be a struggle for some larger organisations though, who rely on such fees to stay in business.

The Wider World

The economic crisis over the last two years will provide one source of consolation to traditional networks. While there is far greater choice than ever for people looking to network, there are also many more people who want and need to do so. The sheer number of redundancies will have led to a surge in consultants and micro businesses, people choosing to take their chances and go it alone rather than risk trying to find another job in a tough and uncertain market. The first piece of advice they are likely to have received when setting up their business in many cases will have been, “go out and network”.

Additionally, I expect to see more networking activity from corporate sales teams in the coming years. The budget cuts forced by the recession, together with the rise in popularity of LinkedIn among staff nervous about their jobs, has raised the profile of networking as a route to market. Sales teams are beginning to recognise the need to work smarter and attend more events. Budget holders are also demanding greater results from staff who previously just ticked the box by attending events. Now they feel more pressure to show a return on the investment.

My only concern is the perceived need to show short-term results. Traditionally sales people from large organisations have followed their instincts and looked to sell at events. When they have inevitably failed, they’ve written off networking as a route to market. For corporates to realise the potential from networks, they have to take a much more strategic, long-term view and give their teams the confidence and freedom to build relationships, help others in their network and generate referrals over time.

Similarly, away from networking events, sales teams have a wealth of potential new business introducers within their existing networks if they embrace a strong referral strategy. It’s time for them to move away from looking at referrals as an afterthought at the end of a client meeting and hone a more focused approach. Marketing teams have shown that they recognise the power of word of mouth marketing through viral and buzz marketing, as well as social media. The next step is to develop this into the referral arena. This will take time and I’m not sure that we will see this on a wide scale in the immediate future.


Networking Internally

Of course, networking is not just about sales and perhaps its key role currently in corporate life is in personal career development. This is a trend that I expect to see continuing and perhaps even accelerating.

With less job security and flatter management structures providing fewer opportunities to progress, people need to network to develop their career. There is less of a culture of ‘a job for life’ than even ten years ago and people’s networks both internally and externally play an ever-stronger role in their career planning.

If you work in a large organisation you need to have a strong profile across departments if you want to progress your career. Internal networks play an important part in helping people make the connections and have the conversations they need. Most major organisations have women’s networks and an increasing number of similar opportunities will present themselves. I believe that the ability to network effectively will increasingly become a skill that employers look for when recruiting for new positions.


The Future of Networking

Relationship-building and strong networks are becoming more vital as the nature of business and employment changes. These qualities have grown in importance over the last decade but the combination of social media technology and the economic climate over recent years has accelerated that growth.

We are entering a period where those with weak networks and poor interpersonal skills will find life increasingly difficult. And it will be the same whether you run your own business, are employed by someone else or you are a student looking at your plans for the future.

In a connected society, those people who have the wherewithal to build and leverage a strong and diverse network are going to have the advantage. We now hear more talk about ‘relationship capital’ and ‘social capital’, further evidence that human connections are becoming recognised for their role in business and career building.

The tools are now in place to help people who want to take their relationships to another level. A clear strategy for doing so, together with a strong focus on why, will help make the difference.




*Direct2Dell blog June 2009




COMMENT On This Article!

FREE NEWSLETTER

Published by THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. All rights reserved. Subscribe Free, and get your BLUE TUESDAY REPORT, too. - Click HERE.
The National Networker Companies

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

The BLUE TUESDAY Report - January 5, 2010

Gracious...Oh no...it's, it's The BLUE TUESDAY Report.

Instructions for the inexperienced and the faint of heart:

1. Click on the blue rectangle of your choice.
2. A whole new page (a whole new vista, a whole new world, a whole new way of living) will open up to you.
3. Read and enjoy the fabulous content. Gather some intel for your tactical and strategic planning... and some interesting factoids to sprinkle on your luncheon conversation. You will sound razor sharp and be socially engaging. It is possible that you will find yourself better-looking as well. There are accounts of this happening.
4. Click gently on the "back" arrow in the upper left-hand corner of your computer screen.
5. You will find yourself back here once again. But don't go to the coat check room just yet...
6. Click on another blue rectangle of your choice.
7. Repeat the process and appreciate your improved manual dexterity from doing this exercise. Proper posture is essential, lest you suffer back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome or ambient halitosis (this last one is not really a disease, although after some enterprising law firm reads this, it may well be the basis for a class-action lawsuit).

See how easy it is!

If you aren't already receiving your own emailed version of The BLUE TUESDAY Report, simply click on http://twitlik.com/IN, and we'll send it to you for free, along with The National Networker Newsletter.

And now, it's off to the blues!

Adam and Douglas





TNNW Surveys, Analyses and Findings

TNNW Product/Service of the Week
Amazing New Facts and Statistics
This Week's Top News Stories
Featured Company of the Week
Featured Deal of the Week
Most Memorable Quote of the Week

Great Websites and Blogs to Explore
This Week;s Top Buzzed Items and Terms
BACKTALK™: Comments From Our Readers
But wait. There's more!

 *These are memorable pictures of Douglas and Adam (top), and Douglas with his blues machine, Lester (bottom). You gotsa pay ya dues if ya wants to sing da blues, baby. -DC


COMMENT On This Article!

FREE NEWSLETTER

Published by THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. All rights reserved. Subscribe Free, and get your BLUE TUESDAY REPORT, too. - Click HERE.
The National Networker Companies

Making HARD CHOICES - A Thought-Provoking Exercise

Making Hard Choices – A Thought-Provoking Exercise

Sponsored by The Blue Tuesday Report (A TNNWC Publication) and Douglas Castle's Braintenance Blog.





Dear Friends:


I respectfully submit some questions for your consideration and response via comment to this Group. Answer honestly, without regard for what you think the conventionally appropriate answers may be:


1. Would you rather be loved or feared? Why?


2. Would you rather have a singular extraordinary talent (without any other competencies beyond the minimal), or be "fairly good" at a large number of things? Why?


3. Would you rather have fame or fortune? Why?


4. Would you rather be the most valued participant on a team, or would you rather be a participant on the most valued, successful team? Why?


5. Would you rather serve a decisive leader, or a leader who decides by consensus or committee? Why?


6. Would you rather face your life friendless, anonymous and constantly on the run, or serve a two-year prison sentence? Why?


7. Would you rather try to outrun an expert gunman, or attempt to disarm him? Why?


Your life is filled with difficult choices, and constant attempts to achieve compromise, balance and a sense of reason.

What would you choose in each of the foregoing "hard choice" scenarios, if you could not mitigate, hedge, negotiate, alter terms, propose an alternative or negotiate at all?


Think about each question carefully. Think about the answers you would choose. Do you find that you are learning about yourself by this exercise?

An observation: Leadership begins with deep self-knowledge.

Please let us know your answers by clicking on the COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE button below. Your answers can be anonymous if you choose.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle
http://braintenance.blogspot.com/ [strain your brain]
http://twitlik.com/IN - Click on this link to join our community (for free) and to access our amazing services.

COMMENT On This Article!

FREE NEWSLETTER

Published by THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. All rights reserved. Subscribe Free, and get your BLUE TUESDAY REPORT, too. - Click HERE.
The National Networker Companies
Do we predict the future...or do we actually create it? http://twitlik.com/PredictionParadox The Global Futurist salutes the TNNW Companies

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

SUICIDE: Being Proactive Can Save a Life.

Public Service Announcement:

The American Foundation For Suicide Prevention Programs. Help save a life. Learn more - http://twitlik.com/AFSP   Every life is precious. Know how to help. Know how to access emergency treatment. Always take any discussions or thoughts of suicide seriously. Don't ever leave a suicidal person alone. An hour of conversation while waiting for emergency help to arrive can make all the difference.

If you are having thoughts of suicide, call for emergency treatment (there are some excellent resources at LINKS 4 LIFE), and then call a friend or family member. Keep calling until you connect. If you can't get anyone, get to a place where there are people and some activity. There's hope... and there's help. I promise.

Douglas Castle,
THE NATIONAL NETWORKER COMPANIES

Monday, January 4, 2010

The National Networker Updates & Newsletter Articles, January, 2009, Week 1

The National Networker Updates & Newsletter Articles, January, 2009, Week 1

Added Feature: Management Lessons From The War On Terror

Dear Friends, Colleagues and Members:

Welcome to 2010, and to the promise of a wonderful New Year with the National Networker Companies and our GICBC. You'll be hearing a great deal about these things in the very near future, so be certain to stay tuned. If you are not already a Member, please join immediately (it's free) by clicking on http://twitlik.com/IN . It is one of the best personal and business decisions that you will ever make. It is one New Year's resolution you can make and keep by just clicking on a link: http://twitlik.com/IN .

Faithfully, and in Friendship,

Douglas Castle
Vice-Chairman
THE NATIONAL NETWORKER COMPANIES

A NOTE FROM THE CHAIRMAN: TNNW's Plans for 2010

Adam J. Kovitz

 

TNNW UPDATES!

Update! - 2010 - The Year Ahead of Us




In the Spotlight:  Special Featured Articles

THIS MIGHT HURT: "Who are you and Why are you here?" - THE NEED TO STATE YOUR MISSION

Douglas Castle


THE ENTREPRENURIAL GUIDE TO ENTERTAINMENT: Six Habits of Highly Successful School Kids That Can Lead Your Company to Greater Profits

Sandy McKee




Featured Columns

BEYOND THE CUBICLE: The Cultural Influence of Global Efficiency

Teri Aulph

VENTURE FINANCE - REALITY VERSUS RUMOR: Outside, Looking In
Dick Brown

 

SALES AND MARKETING: What Can You Do If Your Marketing Isn't Working For You?

Bill Doerr

 

BEING THERE WHEN IT COUNTS: Are you reinforcing your biases?

Rick Itzkowich

 

BECAUSE I CAN: Reality, Fantasy and Sustainability, Part 1

Adam J. Kovitz

 

CONNECTING IS NOT ENOUGH: The Anatomy of a Referral, Part 3

Andy Lopata

 

POWER THOUGHT OF THE WEEK: Blueprints for 2010, Part 1

Patricia Parham, Ph.D.

 

KARL SMITH: Have you done an annual audit of your network before you take off in 2010?

Karl Smith

####


And now, from TAKING COMMAND!: Some Management Lessons Learned From The War On Terror .....


5 RULES:   Information, Communication, Coordination, Command and Control

***This article was written by Douglas Castle for publication in TAKING COMMAND! The article may be reproduced, re-published or transmitted without the author's permission provided that 1) the article is reprinted in its entirety (without editing, deletion or addition) with proper attribution to the author and the original publication, and that 2) all hyperlinks are left intact and live. Douglas Castle is a Featured Columnist with THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. You may subscribe and receive this publication for free at http://twitlik.com/IN.

Dear Friends:

This is actually a brief article on effective management technique...but the title intriqued you, eh? Thought so.

It would seem that the ultimate managerial objective in life (aside from being "happy") and in business is to control things; to control, if possible and to the greatest extent possible, everything from our own selves (through discipline and self-mastery) to the environment and all of those variables which surround and impact us. Obviously, this includes exerting our control upon others to some extent. 

Humans generally fear a loss of control, and despots throughout time have enslaved entire races, built great empires and destroyed whole civilizations because of their addiction to the very notion of control. For many of these people, and for most of us, control equates to power.
In the military and throughout the world's vast network of self-important members of the Intelligence Community, the conversation is often about Command and Control methods, tactics and strategies.

When the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York were demolished on 9-11 in an act of incredible inhumanity, politicians, agency directors and other proficient high-profile blame-dodgers and blame-placers were quick to point out to the information-hungry public that the extensive loss of life (in excess of 3,000 souls perished in that single incident of terrorism) was far greater than it should have been due to a failure in the system of command and control among the various responding security and safety agencies when they were put to the ultimate real-time test.

When various intelligence agencies do not share information and do not coordinate their efforts through effective communications and monitored feedback, a loss of control invariably results. This deficiency of control can mean that a hostile individual or force can penetrate our most well-conceived defenses. When various department heads within a business enterprise do not share information and do not coordinate their efforts through effective communications and monitored feedback, a loss of profit or marketshare results.

To utilize what we have learned from our mistakes in the War on Terror and the Global Recession, we must be ever-mindful to incorporate these processes in every aspect of managing any multi-party process; whether it relates to Homeland Security or to operating a chain of supermarkets:

1. Collect as much information as possible about every relevant variable. In fact, we should ask our counterparts in other agencies or departments for the type of information that they are looking for in order that we may help them; of course, they should reciprocate. This increase the overall probability of success in the early but crucial campaign phase of gathering intelligence. We are less likely to overlook things and more likely to find things. 

2. We must frequently share and compare information. This is a synergistic process which makes every agency or department better-informed, and it allows more eyes and minds to evaluate data in terms of trends and implications from a greater number of meaningful perspectives. Hoarding information can be very counterproductive when teamwork is required for success.

3. In deciding to respond to information, we must advise our counterparts as to what we are planning to do. This maximizes the opportunity for constructive feedback and cooperation, while it minimizes the risk of working at redundant or opposing purposes.

4. It is imperative that there is a heirarchical command structure in order to avoid conflicting directives, orders and actions. Every organization is a multicellular organism. When each "cell" (in this moronic metaphor) decides to go its own way, chaos ensues, and "body" is riddled with multiple cancers [you may wish to click on the link over the picture immediately beneath my signature, below]. While intellectual independence is to be commended and encouraged, it must be tempered when circumstances require a system of command and control.

5. We must constantly and openly share our lessons and learning with our counterparts. After evaluating our respective and collective successes and failures, we must cooperatively and collaboratively be innovative and proactive in finding ways to duplicate and enhance the successes, and to avoid or at least mitigate the failures. This would all seem to be common sense. As I have said before, "sense is not common." That is precisely why someone has to write these things. I just happened to be available.

Before you run off to the bowling alley or to the corner bodega to buy a lottery ticket, please take a moment to read the article below, which was excerpted from THE NEW YORK TIMES of several days ago. It has some relevence. I wish you all a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year, filled with learning, growth and love.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle

Below: Depiction of Apoptosis in a cancerous cell.

New York Times
December 30, 2009

Obama Cites ‘Systemic Failure’ in U.S. Security

HONOLULU – President Obama on Tuesday blamed a “systemic failure” in the nation’s security apparatus for the attempted bombing of a passenger jet on Christmas Day and vowed to identify the problems and “deal with them immediately.” Making his second public statement on the matter in as many days, Mr. Obama said a preliminary assessment already has made clear that there was a breakdown in the intelligence review system that did not properly identify the suspect as a dangerous extremist who should have been prevented from flying to the United States. “A systemic failure has occurred and I consider that totally unacceptable,” Mr. Obama told reporters here in Hawaii, where is in the middle of a 10-day holiday vacation. The president said he has ordered government agencies to report back to him on Thursday about what happened and said he would “insist on accountability at every level,” although he did not elaborate. The president’s blunt words came just two days after his secretary of homeland security, Janet Napolitano, drew criticism for saying that “the system worked” after Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to ignite explosive chemicals aboard a Northwest Airlines flight approaching Detroit. Ms. Napolitano quickly recalibrated her statement to make clear she meant that the system worked in its response to the incident after it occurred. But Mr. Obama’s sharp assessment Tuesday sent a signal that he was not satisfied by the government’s performance. Mr. Obama made no reference to Ms. Napolitano’s statement and took no questions. He made sure to praise the professionalism of the nation’s intelligence, counterterrorism and law enforcement officials. But he spared little in his withering judgment of what he called a “mix of human and systemic failures” that did not catch Mr. Abdulmutallab. The president suggested that he would overhaul the nation’s watch-list system. “We’ve achieved much since 9/11 in terms of collecting information that relates to terrorists and potential terrorist attacks,” he said. “But it’s becoming clear that the system that has been in place for years now is not sufficiently up to date to take full advantage of the information we collect and the knowledge we have.” Mr. Abdulmutallab, a 23-year-old Nigerian who claims links to a branch of Al Qaeda, came to the attention of American authorities when his father went to the embassy last month to report that his son had become radicalized. The father, a respected retired banker, did not say his son planned to attack Americans but sought help locating him and bringing him home, according to American officials. The embassy sent a cable to Washington that resulted in Mr. Abdulmutallab’s name being entered in a broad database of 550,000 people with possible ties to terrorism. But he was not put on the much smaller no-fly list of 4,000 people, or a list of 14,000 people who require additional screening before flying, nor was his multiple-entry visa to the United States revoked. “It now appears that weeks ago this information was passed to a component of our intelligence community but was not effectively distributed so as to get the suspect’s name on a no-fly list,” Mr. Obama said of the father’s warning. “There appears to be other deficiencies as well. Even without this one report, there were bits of information available within the intelligence community that could have and should have been pieced together.” ####
Labels: communications, coordination, collaboration, cooperation, information-sharing, course correction, Barack Obama, terrorism, apoptosis

 COMMENT On This Article!

Miasma: Grouply, Yahoo, Google, MSN, command, control, leadership, decisionmaking, The National Networker, Internal Energy Plus, Humanitas Maximus, The Internal Energy Plus Forum, control, public service, inspiration, survival, uniting, dividing, conquest, growth, personal growth, self-improvement, personal development, networking, Mixx, Zimbio, Digg, Delicious, Technorati, Associated Press, LA Times, Fox News, Reuters, alpha, beta, theta, education, leadership crisis, personal power, humanitarianism, The Global Futurist, The Internationalist Page, Braintenance, Current Events, blogs, bloggers, news, news releases, Douglas Castle, intelligence, cognitive enhancement, advice, help, psychology, focus, technology, seduction, manipulation, debate, education, hypnosis, NLP, RET, articles, Linked In, Microsoft, SEO, fitness, longevity, creativity, meditation, media, YouTube, organizational engineering, winning, success, telepathy, trends, predictions, commentary, blogosphere, relationships, torture, victory, health, fitness, independence, mind, brain, thought, entrainment, Facebook, Naymz, downloads, CDs, tapes, instruction, competition, martial arts, politics, management, widget, blidget, social networking, nanotechnology, fitness, social Darwinism, humor, alternative energy, philanthropy, not-for-profit organizations, volunteering, interrogation, trade, commerce, personal dynamics, personal coaching, networking, leadership training, mind-body connection, nootropics, longevity, social groups, business groups, marketing, ecommerce, Feedburner, RSS, newsletters, writers, co-operative advertising, leverage, survivalism, viral marketing, public relations, advertising, promotion, image-development, videos, gaming, AI, social awareness, persuasion, theology, logic, alliances, reputation, ratings, polls, standing, positioning, self-help, metrics, design, interactivity, campaign, Wikis, chat rooms, interactive forums, mentoring, modeling, mind expansion, brainwaves, motivation, current events, press releases, keywords, adwords, economics, Wikipedia, Widgetbox, geopolitical economics, conflict resolution, activism, achievement, subconscious, collective mind, webinars, business services, self-growth, control, winning, fail-safe strategies, combat, strength, Internal Energy Plus, self-defense, winning strategies and tactics, improvisation, anti-terrorism, courage, victory, fear, psychological programming,...

Published by THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. All rights reserved. Subscribe Free, and get your BLUE TUESDAY REPORT, too. - Click HERE.

The National Networker Companies

FAITH IS NOT …

"Faith is not a pill you take, but a muscle you use."

An Unknown Author

Your action for today is to do something to reinforce your faith!

Click *here* to find out more about QuoteActions and some of the other innovative products and services offered by THE NATIONAL NETWORKER.

As the creator of the QuoteActions, a unique relationship building system, Rick Itzkowich finds his articles, podcasts and blog messages regarding keeping your brand "top of mind" in high demand. His latest eBook, Social Networking for Business Profits, uses cost-effective follow up strategies. Rick is also the Co-founder and Vice President of Productive Learning & Leisure, a personal development training company for corporations and individuals. Rick can be reached at rick@productivelearning.com.

For more about Rick Itzkowich, please click here.




*******
Posted to THE NATIONAL NETWORKER (TNNW). All rights reserved.

To subscribe for your free TNNW Newsletter, go to http://www.thenationalnetworker.com/ For the complete National Networker (TNNW) Relationship Capital Toolkit and a free continuous RSS feed (available either by traditional RSS or by direct email), go to: http://thenationalnetworkerweblog.blogspot.com/